The United States’ seizure of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro drew sharp criticism and highlighted deep divisions among member states at an emergency United Nations Security Council meeting.
While many countries acknowledged that Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader, they condemned the US military operation as a violation of international law and the UN Charter, calling for a democratic transition that genuinely reflects the will of the Venezuelan people.
Among US allies, France emerged as the most vocal critic. Deputy Ambassador Jay Dharmadhikari argued that the operation “runs counter to the principle of peaceful dispute resolution and the non-use of force.” He warned that violations of the UN Charter by permanent Security Council members “chip away at the very foundation of the international order” and undermine global peace and security. Denmark voiced similar concerns, with Deputy UN Ambassador Sandra Jensen Landi describing the seizure as a “dangerous precedent” for international law.
European criticism contrasts with more muted responses from the UK and Greece, whose diplomats emphasised dialogue and a peaceful transition without explicitly condemning the US action. Acting UK Ambassador James Kariuki stressed that London “reaffirms its commitment to international law and the principles enshrined in the UN Charter.”
Several developing nations were also critical. Colombia’s ambassador Leonor Zalabata Torres described the unilateral use of force as a “serious violation of international law.” Panama’s ambassador expressed concern over US plans to collaborate with Maduro loyalist Delcy Rodríguez, warning it could perpetuate a repressive regime. Russia labelled the operation “international banditry” and accused US allies of double standards, while China called it a “unilateral, illegal and bullying act.”
US Ambassador Mike Waltz defended the operation, framing it as a law-enforcement measure against a leader allegedly involved in drug trafficking and terrorism. Waltz argued that Venezuela’s energy reserves must not fall under the control of adversaries of the US, citing threats from Hezbollah, Cuban intelligence agents, and gangs.
The incident has exposed a diplomatic dilemma for Europe, torn between defending UN principles of sovereignty and maintaining a pragmatic alliance with the US, particularly regarding security support for Ukraine. French and Danish criticism now aligns with Spain, whose Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez warned that illegal intervention threatens regional stability.
European leaders face a broader question about their strategic independence. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk urged the continent to strengthen its own security, warning that a divided Europe risks being disregarded by allies and adversaries alike.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres expressed “deep concern” over the disregard for international law, stating: “The power of the law must prevail.” The situation leaves global powers grappling with the tension between realpolitik and the enforcement of international norms, with lasting implications for the future of Venezuelan governance and international security.
Source BBC